wordwhacker: (Default)
Well, it looks like this is it for the Media Living journal. I have a few closing comments to make that have to do with the last reading for the course, and a few more media use-type things to mention, too. Then this journal goes back to being my writing journal, and none too soon - I've got to get a few submissions to Vox out by the end of the week, and now that NaNoWriMo is over for another year (and as you can tell by my icon, I am a WINNAH!), my creativity has been kicked into high gear.

Last week was basically paper-writing week, which means that my life has basically been cycles of MS Word usage and, briefly, Rock Band / The Bully playing as brain breaks. I've been downloading stuff a little more lately, too - found a Cat Stevens song that I wanted to learn on the guitar, and one of my study breaks on Saturday was my learning to play it. And does anybody else remember "Saga," the Canadian progressive rock group from the eighties? My folks liked their stuff a lot and, as much eighties music does, it inspires me with nostalgia. My dad was listening to the radio the other day and "Wind Him Up" came on, and I remembered how much I liked it, so I poked around online and found that album. It's decent, but I don't know if I would bother purchasing it - there are only two songs that interest me (the other being "On the Loose").

I found "Wind Him Up" on YouTube too, and the "more info" that accompanies it is interesting:
Saga - Legendary Canadian Progrock
Live at the Metropolis - Montreal 1984
Rock Etc Canadian TV Broadcast
www.saga-world.com

Over half the songs from the show including this one, DID NOT make it to the Silhouette official DVD.

Here it is for your enjoyment.








This is kind of cool because it shows that putting concert footage up on YouTube isn't usually about any kind of disrespect for the bands, or even for the companies that have the rights to the footage. Lots of info about the group and the concert, even where the concert was broadcast, is included there. But there's obviously some annoyance about the DVD not having this and lots of other songs - how are consumers supposed to have any iota of support for centralized production and distribution if they're going to omit desired material? I recently found some Utopia videos from a concert in 1982 which belong to a discontinued DVD, as well. Obviously lots of stuff that IS available is spread around, and that's the main concern that copyright holders have (I'd wager), but it isn't the ONLY thing going on. People will happily distribute things themselves if they aren't worth it for a company to do it, or if a company is slack about it (like with the Saga DVD above.) And it isn't all about simply sticking it to the man.

More hides behind the cut! )
wordwhacker: (Default)
Sadly re: this week's reading topic, I haven't been playing a lot of video games lately, but that's nothing new. (Just Rock Band. I love it because it's a bit of physical exertion as well as a totally different way of engaging my brain. Makes for wonderful study breaks!) Mostly I'm spending a lot of time on email, making appointments to meet with profs and people for school groups, occasionally conversing with friends. I also tend to email my papers to myself as I work on them so I always have a backup (I also have saves at several stages).

I liked this week's reading, though (namely, "Playing on the digital commons: collectivities, capital and contestation in videogame culture" by Sarah Coleman and Nick Dyer-Witheford,) and I want to comment on a couple of things re: my own gaming history, a gaming mod project I was involved in at one time, and some hopes I have about the future of rhythm-based gaming like Rock Band/Guitar Hero - a future that may very well revolve around hacking/modding.

Come hither! )
wordwhacker: (NaNo 2004)
I thought I would have more to say about this week's reading, but I am realizing something as I go through it: I don't really participate in participatory journalism. I know that it happens. I am also sometimes directed to political blogs and mainstream news sources with copious comments by other internet users - which, I guess, is really a big part of the whole idea of participatory journalism anyway. Even though my livejournal friends page is not entirely politically-geared, they can essentially morph into political discussion spaces, drawing in mainstream and blogosphere sources at the drop of a hat and spreading them meme-style.

Which I guess is a way of expressing - maybe even expanding upon - the introduction to participatory journalism that comes up in this week's reading from The Media Center:

"Participatory journalism flourishes in social media — the interpersonal communication that takes place through email, chat, message boards, forums — and in collaborative media — hybrid forms of news, discussion and community."

What I'm suggesting, I guess, is that the boundaries of participatory journalism are really easily blurred into the space that one could more generally call "participatory culture."

I don't have a lot else to say, but I wanted to also comment specifically on the weaknesses of "discussion group" settings:

"Weaknesses: Sometimes forums are too open, easily garnering flip, reactive comments. Active, large forums can get noisy, with so many posts from so many members, it's hard to determine what information is meaningful or useful. In addition, some moderated forums require each post to be pre-approved before it appears online, slowing down and smothering the conversation."

My comment is generally an emphatic YEP! This is, in a nutshell, why I don't go out of my way to participate in political (and other forms of) discussion online. In my last blog post I talked about the difficulty of navigating in a forum populated by thousands of active participants. And re: the modding business, I have heard some interesting and frightening horror stories about having to moderate big-name forums. Though this wasn't so much about conversation-smothering as reigning-in-the-hatemongering, which is a definite up-side to forum moderation. (I should point out that this reading does also focus on the positive aspects of online discussion groups, which I generally agree with as well - for instance, the ease of participation and the lowered technical and financial resources for participation in general.)

That's it from me for now - off to class!
wordwhacker: (NaNo 2004)
Okay, I'll admit it: I really did find that first Jenkins article that we had to read for this class boring. But Jenkins has completely made it up to me in this article on fan culture and collective intelligence (which I think I've read before, but I enjoy it so much that I don't care.) It's written in a very accessible style, so if you are at all interested in fandom I recommend you take a look at it. It's a bit long, but it's worth it. I'll be quoting from it somewhat liberally this week.

What makes it so topical is a discussion I had with my friends over the weekend, after we'd finished recording my podcast about podcasts (which I'll be putting up this weekend.) This is a conversation that we've had before, and it may be familiar to some of you, especially people who are familiar with fandom and fanfic in general.

We were talking about how Anne Rice is insane.

Okay, okay, so that might be a bit harsh. In the interest of protecting my ass if her lawyers come after me (which they probably won't unless I start writing fanfiction based on her characters), I'll use my "I statements". I think, based on many of the things she's said on her website and in Amazon.com reviews of her own books, that she has some ISSUES, with a capital ISSUES.

Below: Does Ms. Rice exemplify fears of new communications technologies and the fandoms that use them? Or is she just... DIFFERENT? )
wordwhacker: (NaNo 2006)
So when I started this blog I made a generic entry which outlines my media use throughout the day. This is kind of handy, because it means that for the most part I can focus in on particular activities and try to be reflective and relevant to my course materials. Fun fun. But now and then I catch myself using media in different ways, and by the time I'm going to write a blog entry I've forgotten some of it.

Clearly, I need to get a little notepad or something and carry it with me for a few days so I can jot things down as I go. That way I can watch for trends, as well as remember neat little things that will make for a good blog entry. I'm toying with the idea of doing this through "Twitter" - I hardly EVER send texts, and I'm sure I have a number of "free" ones included in my cell phone plan. (And I think you can update them directly on the site, too.) Since lots of people are starting to do this it could be an interesting experiment. Look for some "twitter" updates here over the next week or so, between my normal blog entries.

For a while I've been thinking about the digital media fast that Danna Walker got her students to do in "The Longest Day". It would be interesting to do this - a few times I've all but decided to go for it. There are lots of things that I could cut out for a day or two, to see how I feel. I could go for walks without my mp3 player; I could write long-hand and read textbooks (and, y'know, normal books) instead of use the computer.

Read more... )
wordwhacker: (NaNo 2005)
I'm putting this up so that I will remember to comment on it in more detail later - check back if you're interested.

Back when I was at Macquarie taking my "Poetics of New Media" course, one of my classmates made a presentation and did a really simple little experiment. He asked me (well, he asked the class, and I answered) how I would describe myself. I said something like, "25 year old student, Canadian, genderqueer..." I think I might have talked about liking travel, that kind of thing. Anyway, then he noted that I hadn't immediately described myself in terms of my technology use or media consumption - I didn't call myself an internet addict, a film afficionado, whatever. So when I started reading danah boyd's article, Incantations for Muggles, this stood out to me:

"Technologies become ubiquitous when people stop thinking them as atechnology and simply use them as a regular part of everyday life."

Unrelated but awesome - XKCD today is SPOT ON re: the debate about digial rights management.
wordwhacker: (NaNo 2004)
My parents went to the Elton John concert last night. I would have loved to go but tickets were both expensive as hell and nigh impossible to get. So I was sitting at home listening to his greatest hits on the stereo when I get a call on my cell phone from my MUM's cell phone. At first it was just garbled bits of sound, but then it resolved into Elton John's voice singing "Tiny Dancer." The sound quality was mostly terrible; the piano (which I could only hear for part of the time) sounded like a mangled child's toy some of the time, thanks to the tiny microphone in the phone being TOTALLY blown out with the volume (and the speaker in my own phone isn't exactly audio magic itself.) But I could hear his voice well enough to make out the lyrics and the melody. So I stood by my front door and lip-synched to one of my favourite songs in the world, which was being sung live by Sir Elton himself, right here in Saint John, and bounced from mum's cell phone up to a satellite and down again to mine, about a kilometre and a half away.

I thought that was a pretty cool digital media experience.

My parents were telling me that there were signs up everywhere saying not to bring recording equipment or cameras to the show. But god, what's a cell phone now WITHOUT a camera? And I'm not too "up" on cell technology but if they're becoming mp3 players as well it seems to me that recording technology will be standard issue soon, too. So what are you supposed to do? Take away peoples' cell phones? That would probably be an exercise in complete madness.

More thoughts below: why cellphones could soon be dangerous, writing papers long-hand, and sports TV as a dramatic narrative. )
wordwhacker: (NaNo 2004)
So I've been thinking for the past few days that I would make an update here. Just a short one, talking about what I've been doing, how I've been investing my time into various electronic media. But I keep getting stalled by one thing: nothing has changed. The generic "how my (digial) day goes" post is frightningly accurate - even moreso than I figured it would be. It's been a little strange to realize that I really DON'T vary all that much in my media habits. I spend a similar amount of time watching TV and surfing the net every day.

And I have to wonder: does this have something to do with my guilt about "wasting my time"? I think I'll start calling it "digital guilt." I don't feel guilty about the time I spend, say, reading a book before bed. But surfing the net and television are definitely sources of guilt in my daily life. I feel bad for doing it, and I typically feel that I should be investing myself differently.

The question is, how right am I? )
wordwhacker: (NaNo 2007)
School's in, and I'm cracking open the ol' writing blog again for use in my "Media Living" class. We have to keep a journal throughout the semester wherein we talk about our media use, in conjunction with the course readings. Because I'm nice, I'll keep most of these under a cut so you can skip 'em if you want.

I'm going to kick things off with a "day in the life" view of my media usage. This should be great fodder for the start of a discussion about media addiction, maybe in a day or two. How convenient!

So you're asking yourself. "Cass - how DO you use media in your daily life?" Right? Of course you are.

Well, it goes a little something like this: )
Page generated Jul. 24th, 2017 08:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios